CarteaCompare CarsRange Rover SE P360 3.0L vs EHS9 Executive

Range Rover SE P360 3.0L vs EHS9 Executive Comparison

Car Information

/

160+245

/

≥500

/

99

Engine / Motor

/

200 km/h

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

/

5 Doors

/

5209 mm

/

2010 mm

/

1713 mm

/

3110 mm

/

438 L

/

200 m

Fuel Economy

8.5

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

4-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Bucket

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

16.2

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.0 L - 5.0 L

/

360 BHP - 525 BHP

429 BHP - 543 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

4 Seater - 5 Seater

4 Seater - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km - 515 km

Engine

3.0 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

360 BHP

429 BHP

/

300+450

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

8

/

options.Lithium-Ion

/

160+245 kW

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    • EHS9 Executive

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • 360 Degree camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickEHS9 Executive

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Range Rover SE P360 3.0L if you care more about overall equipment; choose EHS9 Executive if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    VS

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    VS

    Hongqi | Hongqi EHS9 2022 Flagship (4 Seats)

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    VS

    Hongqi | Hongqi EHS9 2021 Flagship (4 Seats)

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | GLS 450 4MATIC

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while EHS9 Executive has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a wheelbase of No data, while EHS9 Executive has a wheelbase of 3110 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover SE P360 3.0L uses No data, while EHS9 Executive uses All Wheel Drive.