Range Rover SE P360 3.0L vs Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
250 km/h
/
6
/
2999 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
4 Doors
/
4924 mm
/
1948 mm
/
1796 mm
/
2995 mm
/
655 L
/
198 m
Fuel Economy
8.5
11
/
85 L
/
9 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
9-speed automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 5.0 L
3.0 L - 4.0 L
360 BHP - 525 BHP
367 BHP - 625 hp
Automatic
9-speed automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 - 5
Engine
3.0 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
360 BHP
429 BHP
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
320
/
560 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Range Rover SE P360 3.0L
Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Range Rover SE P360 3.0L if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a wheelbase of No data, while Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2995 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover SE P360 3.0L uses No data, while Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive.