Range Rover SE P360 3.0L vs GLS 450 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
250 km/h
/
6
/
2999 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
/
5 Doors
/
5207 mm
/
2030 mm
/
1850 mm
/
3135 mm
/
493 L
/
200 m
Fuel Economy
8.5
8 Km/L
/
90 L
/
8 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
9-speed automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 5.0 L
3.0 L - 4.7 L
360 BHP - 525 BHP
375 BHP - 550 BHP
Automatic
9-speed automatic & 9G-TRONIC 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 - 7
Engine
3.0 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
360 BHP
375 BHP
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
275
/
500 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Range Rover SE P360 3.0L
GLS 450 4MATIC
- 360 Degree Camera
- Remote key types
- Blind Spot Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGLS 450 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Range Rover SE P360 3.0L if you care more about fuel economy; choose GLS 450 4MATIC if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while GLS 450 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, Range Rover SE P360 3.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a wheelbase of No data, while GLS 450 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3135 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover SE P360 3.0L uses No data, while GLS 450 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.