Range Rover SE P360 3.0L vs Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

190 km/h

/

6

Dimensions

5 Seater

7

/

5 Doors

/

4828 mm

/

1943 mm

/

1792 mm

/

2916 mm

/

782 L

Fuel Economy

8.5

/

/

23 Gallon/ 87L

/

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

Smart Keyless Entry

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

2nd Row Manual 60:40 Split

Safety

/

/

Collision Mitigation Braking System (CMBS)

/

Blind Spot Information System

/

Transmission

Automatic

8AT

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.0 L - 5.0 L

3.6 L - 6.4 L

360 BHP - 525 BHP

286 BHP - 707 BHP

Automatic

8AT & Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

4 Seater - 5 Seater

5 - 7

Engine

3.0 L

3.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

360 BHP

293 BHP

/

3.6L V6

/

350 Nm

Exterior

/

Black

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    • Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo

      • Keyless Entry
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Rear Camera
      • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
      • Collision Detection
      • Blind Spot Warning
      • ABS

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • Versatility of options for powerful engines
    • Impressive off-road driving capabilities
    • High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies

    Negative

    • High fuel consumption for some models
    • High price compared to some competitors
    • Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickGrand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Range Rover SE P360 3.0L if you care more about power; choose Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    VS

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    VS

    Hongqi | Hongqi EHS9 2022 Flagship (4 Seats)

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    VS

    Hongqi | Hongqi EHS9 2021 Flagship (4 Seats)

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | GLS 450 4MATIC

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a wheelbase of No data, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo has a wheelbase of 2916 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover SE P360 3.0L uses No data, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo uses All Wheel Drive.