CarteaCompare CarsRange Rover SE P360 3.0L vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

Range Rover SE P360 3.0L vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

210 km/h

/

6

/

3490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

/

5 Doors

/

5115 mm

/

1980 mm

/

1920 mm

/

2890 mm

/

1004 L

/

221 m

Fuel Economy

8.5

9.4 Km/L

/

110 L

/

9.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.0 L - 5.0 L

3.3 L - 5.7 L

360 BHP - 525 BHP

240 BHP - 409

Automatic

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

Gasoline

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

4 Seater - 5 Seater

7 - 8 Seater

Engine

3.0 L

4.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

360 BHP

271 BHP

/

V

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

385 Nm

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    • Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • 360 Degree camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Sensor Rear Tailgate
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • Powerful off-road capabilities
    • Exceptional reliability and durability
    • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

    Negative

    • High fuel consumption
    • High purchase and maintenance costs
    • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickLand Cruiser 4.0L EXR

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Range Rover SE P360 3.0L if you care more about power; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    VS

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    VS

    Hongqi | Hongqi EHS9 2022 Flagship (4 Seats)

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    VS

    Hongqi | Hongqi EHS9 2021 Flagship (4 Seats)

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | GLS 450 4MATIC

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P360 3.0L

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a wheelbase of No data, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover SE P360 3.0L uses No data, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.