Range Rover SE P360 3.0L vs Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
233 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
5063 mm
/
1970 mm
/
1741 mm
/
2994 mm
/
740 L
Fuel Economy
8.5
12.3 Km/L
/
85 L
/
12.3 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 5.0 L
2.0 L - 6.0 L
360 BHP - 525 BHP
252 BHP - 500 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater - 6 Seater
Engine
3.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
360 BHP
252 BHP
/
370 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Range Rover SE P360 3.0L
Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickQ7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Range Rover SE P360 3.0L if you care more about power; choose Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) has a fuel consumption of 8.13. Therefore, Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a wheelbase of No data, while Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) has a wheelbase of 2994 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover SE P360 3.0L uses No data, while Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) uses All Wheel Drive.