CarteaCompare CarsRenault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic vs Alsvin 1.5L Advanced

Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic vs Alsvin 1.5L Advanced Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

185

/

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4147

4390 mm

1740

1725 mm

1534

1468 mm

2630

2535 mm

560

500 L

Fuel Economy

12.0

13 Km/L

50

45 L

/

13 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

Infotainment

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

1.6 L

1.5 L - 1.5 L

105 BHP

105 BHP - 105 BHP

Automatic

Automatic & DCT

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.6 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

105 BHP

105 BHP

128

145 Nm

Technologies

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Keyless Entry
    • Steering Adjustment
  • Alsvin 1.5L Advanced

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Competitive price compared to competitors
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Advanced technical features for its class

Negative

  • Limited internal space
  • Material quality can be improved
  • Engine performance is limited on highways

Related comparisons

Editor's PickRenault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic if you care more about price; choose Alsvin 1.5L Advanced if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Renault | Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic

VS

Hongqi | H7 2.0T Comfortable

Renault | Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic

VS

Hongqi | H7 3.0T Flagship

Renault | Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic

VS

Hongqi | L5 6.0 V12

Renault | Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic

VS

Hongqi | EQM5 T3 Edition

Renault | Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic

VS

Volkswagen | Jetta 2.0 S

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Alsvin 1.5L Advanced has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Alsvin 1.5L Advanced is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a wheelbase of 2630, while Alsvin 1.5L Advanced has a wheelbase of 2535 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic uses Front Wheel Drive, while Alsvin 1.5L Advanced uses Front Wheel Drive.