Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic vs EQM5 T3 Edition Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
4147
5040 mm
1740
1910 mm
1534
1569 mm
2630
2990 mm
560
433 L
Fuel Economy
12.0
/
50
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.6 L
/
105 BHP
134 BHP
Automatic
DHT
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
4 Seater - 5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
105 BHP
134 BHP
128
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
EQM5 T3 Edition
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQM5 T3 Edition
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic if you care more about overall equipment; choose EQM5 T3 Edition if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a wheelbase of 2630, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a wheelbase of 2990 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQM5 T3 Edition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic uses Front Wheel Drive, while EQM5 T3 Edition uses Front Wheel Drive.