Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic vs Binray Basic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4147
4680
1740
1785
1534
1460
2630
2670
560
470
Fuel Economy
12.0
20.8
50
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.6 L
1.0
105 BHP
134 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
1.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
134 BHP
128
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
Binray Basic
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBinray Basic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic if you care more about overall equipment; choose Binray Basic if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Binray Basic has a fuel consumption of 4.81. Therefore, Binray Basic is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a wheelbase of 2630, while Binray Basic has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Binray Basic, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic uses Front Wheel Drive, while Binray Basic uses No data.