Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic vs Emgrand GS 1.5L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

185

240 km/h

4

4

/

1496 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4147

4628 mm

1740

1822 mm

1534

1460 mm

2630

2650 mm

560

500 L

/

4 Doors

/

151 m

Fuel Economy

12.0

13 Km/L

50

50 L

/

13 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

8

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

2

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

1.6 L

1.5 L - 1.5 L

105 BHP

101 BHP - 121

Automatic

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED with Halogen

/

/

/

Engine

1.6 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

105 BHP

121 BHP

128

152 Nm

/

In-Line

/

4

Technologies

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Keyless Entry
    • Steering Adjustment
  • Emgrand GS 1.5L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickRenault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic if you care more about price; choose Emgrand GS 1.5L if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Renault | Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic

VS

Hongqi | H7 2.0T Comfortable

Renault | Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic

VS

Hongqi | H7 3.0T Flagship

Renault | Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic

VS

Hongqi | L5 6.0 V12

Renault | Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic

VS

Hongqi | EQM5 T3 Edition

Renault | Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic

VS

Volkswagen | Jetta 2.0 S

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Emgrand GS 1.5L has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Emgrand GS 1.5L is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a wheelbase of 2630, while Emgrand GS 1.5L has a wheelbase of 2650 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Emgrand GS 1.5L, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic uses Front Wheel Drive, while Emgrand GS 1.5L uses Front Wheel Drive.