Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic vs GT 1.5T STD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
215 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4147
4675 mm
1740
1842 mm
1534
1480 mm
2630
2680 mm
560
401 L
/
4 Doors
Fuel Economy
12.0
16.9 Km/L
50
50 L
/
16.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.6 L
1.5 L
105 BHP
118 BHP - 173 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
173 BHP
128
250 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
GT 1.5T STD
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Attractive sporty design
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced technical features
Negative
- Limited background space
- Less acceleration compared to some competitors
- Limited engine options
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRenault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic if you care more about price; choose GT 1.5T STD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while GT 1.5T STD has a fuel consumption of 5.92. Therefore, GT 1.5T STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a wheelbase of 2630, while GT 1.5T STD has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GT 1.5T STD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic uses Front Wheel Drive, while GT 1.5T STD uses Front Wheel Drive.