Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic vs H9 2.0T Deluxe Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
250 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4147
5137 mm
1740
1904 mm
1534
1493 mm
2630
3060 mm
560
/
Fuel Economy
12.0
14.1 Km/L
50
62 L
/
14.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.6 L
2.0 L - 3.0 L
105 BHP
241 - 321 BHP
Automatic
7DCT & 8AT & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
252 BHP
128
380 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
H9 2.0T Deluxe
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRenault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic if you care more about price; choose H9 2.0T Deluxe if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while H9 2.0T Deluxe has a fuel consumption of 7.09. Therefore, H9 2.0T Deluxe is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a wheelbase of 2630, while H9 2.0T Deluxe has a wheelbase of 3060 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, H9 2.0T Deluxe, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic uses Front Wheel Drive, while H9 2.0T Deluxe uses Rear Wheel Drive.