Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic vs IS 300 Premier 2.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
260 km/h
4
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4147
4665 mm
1740
1810 mm
1534
1430 mm
2630
2800 mm
560
480 L
/
4 Doors
/
140 m
Fuel Economy
12.0
13 Km/L
50
66 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.6 L
2.0 L - 3.5 L
105 BHP
241 BHP - 312 BHP
Automatic
8 Speed Sport Direct Shift
Gasoline
Petrol & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
241 BHP
128
350 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
IS 300 Premier 2.0L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRenault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic if you care more about price; choose IS 300 Premier 2.0L if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, IS 300 Premier 2.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a wheelbase of 2630, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, IS 300 Premier 2.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic uses Front Wheel Drive, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive.