Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic vs Polo Sedan S Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
185 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
4147
4384 mm
1740
1699 mm
1534
1465 mm
2630
2552 mm
560
455 L
Fuel Economy
12.0
14.3 Km/L
50
55 L
/
14.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.6 L
1.6 L
105 BHP
105 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
105 BHP
128
153 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
Polo Sedan S
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickPolo Sedan S
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic if you care more about interior space; choose Polo Sedan S if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Polo Sedan S has a fuel consumption of 6.99. Therefore, Polo Sedan S is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a wheelbase of 2630, while Polo Sedan S has a wheelbase of 2552 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic uses Front Wheel Drive, while Polo Sedan S uses Front Wheel Drive.