Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE vs EQM5 T3 Edition Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
186
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
4905
5040 mm
1787
1910 mm
1475
1569 mm
2775
2990 mm
555
433 L
Fuel Economy
12.0
/
70
/
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.5 L
/
140 BHP - 240 BHP
134 BHP
Automatic
DHT
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
4 Seater - 5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
140 BHP
134 BHP
196
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
EQM5 T3 Edition
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQM5 T3 Edition
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE if you care more about power; choose EQM5 T3 Edition if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE has a wheelbase of 2775, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a wheelbase of 2990 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQM5 T3 Edition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE uses Front Wheel Drive, while EQM5 T3 Edition uses Front Wheel Drive.