Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE vs H7 2.0T Comfortable Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
186
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4905
5095 mm
1787
1875 mm
1475
1485 mm
2775
2970 mm
555
/
Fuel Economy
12.0
16.7 Km/L
70
70 L
/
16.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
140 BHP
204 BHP
196
260 Nm
Key Spec
/
2.0 L - 3.0 L
/
204 BHP - 228 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
H7 2.0T Comfortable
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH7 2.0T Comfortable
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE if you care more about overall equipment; choose H7 2.0T Comfortable if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while H7 2.0T Comfortable has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, H7 2.0T Comfortable is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE has a wheelbase of 2775, while H7 2.0T Comfortable has a wheelbase of 2970 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, H7 2.0T Comfortable, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE uses Front Wheel Drive, while H7 2.0T Comfortable uses Front Wheel Drive.