Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE vs GT 1.5T STD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
186
215 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4905
4675 mm
1787
1842 mm
1475
1480 mm
2775
2680 mm
555
401 L
/
4 Doors
Fuel Economy
12.0
16.9 Km/L
70
50 L
/
16.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.5 L
1.5 L
140 BHP - 240 BHP
118 BHP - 173 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
140 BHP
173 BHP
196
250 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
GT 1.5T STD
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Attractive sporty design
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced technical features
Negative
- Limited background space
- Less acceleration compared to some competitors
- Limited engine options
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRenault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE if you care more about price; choose GT 1.5T STD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while GT 1.5T STD has a fuel consumption of 5.92. Therefore, GT 1.5T STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE has a wheelbase of 2775, while GT 1.5T STD has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE uses Front Wheel Drive, while GT 1.5T STD uses Front Wheel Drive.