SQ6 e-tron vs Tiggo 9 Comparison

Car Information

598 km

/

800V

/

/

192

/

390

/

4820 ×1930 × 1699

/

8.5

/

2.0

Dimensions

5

7

514

/

64

/

/

16英寸

/

4820

/

1930

/

1699

/

2820

Fuel Economy

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

11.9

/

Dinamica Microfibre

/

Sport Seats Plus

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

10

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

14.5

15.6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

4

Battery/Charging

270

/

11

/

10 min

/

Transmission

DHT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

Four-Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

245/50 R20

/

245/50 R20

Key Spec

TBD

/

TBD

254

DHT

Automatic

Electric

Gasoline

TBD

/

5

7

/

2.0

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

2.0

Electric

Gasoline

/

Turbocharge

/

254

/

192

/

390

Motor

Lithium-ion

/

489

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • SQ6 e-tron

    • 360 Degree Camera
  • Tiggo 9

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Power Tailgate
    • Electric Locks
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about price; choose Tiggo 9 if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Omoda | C5 TECH 1.5L

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

SERES | 5 2WD Standard

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

SERES | 5 4WD Premium

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Exeed | TXL Comfort 1.6T

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Exeed | LX Flagship 1.6T

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data, while Tiggo 9 has a fuel consumption of 8.5. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data, while Tiggo 9 has a wheelbase of 2820. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 uses Four-Wheel Drive.