CarteaCompare CarsSupra Track Edition MT vs 718 Boxster Std 2.0L A/T

Supra Track Edition MT vs 718 Boxster Std 2.0L A/T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

6

4

/

275 km/h

/

1988 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

2

2 Seater

19

/

4379

4379 mm

1854

1994 mm

1299

1281 mm

/

2 Doors

/

2475 mm

/

274 L

/

76 m

Fuel Economy

12.4

8 Km/L

52

54 L

/

8 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

/

Dual

/

/

Bucket

Standard

/

/

Leather

/

Dual Zone

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Safety

/

Driver Airbag, Driver Knee Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8.8

7

/

12

6

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

6-Manual Transmission

/

Chassis & Steering

/

/

Rear Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

255/35 R19

/

275/35 R19

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.0 L

2.0 L - 4.0 L

255 BHP - 382 BHP

295 BHP - 495 BHP

6-Manual Transmission & 8 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 8-Speed Automatic & 8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & Manual

TBD

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

2 Seater - 2 Seater

2 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

In-Line

3.0

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Twin Scroll

Single Turbo

382

300 BHP

500

380 Nm

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Supra Track Edition MT

    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • 718 Boxster Std 2.0L A/T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Power performance and Sports Control
  • Unique and attractive exterior design
  • Quality workmanship and attention to detail

Negative

  • Limited seating and storage space
  • Limited driving comfort due to the suspension
  • High cost compared to competitors

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSupra Track Edition MT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Supra Track Edition MT if you care more about price; choose 718 Boxster Std 2.0L A/T if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Supra Track Edition MT

VS

Porsche | 718 Boxster Std 2.0L A/T

Toyota | Supra Track Edition MT

VS

Toyota | Supra Track Edition AT

Toyota | Supra Track Edition MT

VS

Lexus | Lexus RC350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L

Toyota | Supra Track Edition MT

VS

Lexus | RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L

Toyota | Supra Track Edition MT

VS

BMW | Z4 Roadster 2025 xDrive20i

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Supra Track Edition MT has a fuel consumption of 8.06, while 718 Boxster Std 2.0L A/T has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, Supra Track Edition MT is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Supra Track Edition MT has a wheelbase of No data, while 718 Boxster Std 2.0L A/T has a wheelbase of 2475 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Supra Track Edition MT uses No data, while 718 Boxster Std 2.0L A/T uses Rear Wheel Drive.