Supra Track Edition MT vs Supra Track Edition AT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
6
Dimensions
2
2
19
19
4379
4379
1854
1854
1299
1299
Fuel Economy
12.4
14.4
52
52
Comfort
✓
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
Dual
Dual
✓
✓
Bucket
Bucket
Safety
✓
✓
Driver Airbag, Driver Knee Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.
Driver Airbag, Driver Knee Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
8.8
8.8
✓
✓
✓
/
12
12
Transmission
6-Manual Transmission
8-Speed Automatic Transmission
Chassis & Steering
✓
✓
Wheels/brakes
255/35 R19
255/35 R19
275/35 R19
275/35 R19
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
2.0 L - 3.0 L
255 BHP - 382 BHP
255 BHP - 382 BHP
6-Manual Transmission & 8 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 8-Speed Automatic & 8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & Manual
6-Manual Transmission & 8 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 8-Speed Automatic & 8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & Manual
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater - 2 Seater
2 Seater - 2 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
3.0
3.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Scroll
Twin Scroll
382
382
500
500
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Supra Track Edition MT
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Lane Departure Warning
Supra Track Edition AT
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Power performance and Sports Control
- Unique and attractive exterior design
- Quality workmanship and attention to detail
Negative
- Limited seating and storage space
- Limited driving comfort due to the suspension
- High cost compared to competitors
Positive
- Power performance and Sports Control
- Unique and attractive exterior design
- Quality workmanship and attention to detail
Negative
- Limited seating and storage space
- Limited driving comfort due to the suspension
- High cost compared to competitors
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Supra Track Edition MT if you care more about overall equipment; choose Supra Track Edition AT if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Supra Track Edition MT has a fuel consumption of 8.06, while Supra Track Edition AT has a fuel consumption of 6.94. Therefore, Supra Track Edition AT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Supra Track Edition MT has a wheelbase of No data, while Supra Track Edition AT has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Supra Track Edition MT uses No data, while Supra Track Edition AT uses No data.