CarteaCompare CarsTransit Bus Diesel 410L vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter A/T

Transit Bus Diesel 410L vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter A/T Comparison

Car Information

/

Engine / Motor

150

/

4

4

Dimensions

13

3 Seater

16

/

/

1800

/

1985

/

2985

/

6000

/

4715

Fuel Economy

/

10.8

/

75

Comfort

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

10AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

235/65 R16C

/

235/65 R16C

/

Key Spec

2.2 L - 3.7 L

2.5 L - 3.5 L

125 BHP - 299

88 BHP - 277

& 10AT & 8AT & Automatic & Manual

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

2 - 13

3 - 13 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

2.5 L

Diesel

Diesel

165

102 BHP

331

260

Technologies

/

/

/

Normal, Eco, Slippery, Tow/Haul

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Transit Bus Diesel 410L

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter A/T

    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Related comparisons

Editor's PickToyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter A/T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Transit Bus Diesel 410L if you care more about power; choose Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter A/T if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Ford | Transit Bus Diesel 410L

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter A/T

Ford | Transit Bus Diesel 410L

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter M/T

Ford | Transit Bus Diesel 410L

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

Ford | Transit Bus Diesel 410L

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van

Ford | Transit Bus Diesel 410L

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Transit Bus Diesel 410L has a fuel consumption of No data, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter A/T has a fuel consumption of 9.26. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Transit Bus Diesel 410L has a wheelbase of No data, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter A/T has a wheelbase of 2985. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Transit Bus Diesel 410L uses Rear Drive, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter A/T uses Rear Wheel Drive.