CarteaCompare CarsTransit Bus Diesel 410L vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

Transit Bus Diesel 410L vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) Comparison

Car Information

/

Engine / Motor

150

160

4

4

Dimensions

13

13 Seater

16

/

/

1880

/

2285

/

3110

/

9800

/

5380

Fuel Economy

/

9.5

/

70

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

10AT

Manual

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

/

/

Wheels/brakes

235/65 R16C

/

235/65 R16C

/

/

Key Spec

2.2 L - 3.7 L

2.5 L - 3.5 L

125 BHP - 299

88 BHP - 277

& 10AT & 8AT & Automatic & Manual

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

2 - 13

3 - 13 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

2.7 L

Diesel

Gasoline

165

149 BHP

331

240

Technologies

/

/

/

Normal, Eco, Slippery, Tow/Haul

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Transit Bus Diesel 410L

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Temperature Display
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Related comparisons

Editor's PickToyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Transit Bus Diesel 410L if you care more about power; choose Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Ford | Transit Bus Diesel 410L

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter A/T

Ford | Transit Bus Diesel 410L

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter M/T

Ford | Transit Bus Diesel 410L

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

Ford | Transit Bus Diesel 410L

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van

Ford | Transit Bus Diesel 410L

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Transit Bus Diesel 410L has a fuel consumption of No data, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Transit Bus Diesel 410L has a wheelbase of No data, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Transit Bus Diesel 410L uses Rear Drive, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) uses Rear Wheel Drive.