CarteaCompare CarsTransit Cargo Van 350M MR vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB

Transit Cargo Van 350M MR vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB Comparison

Car Information

/

Engine / Motor

150

160

4

4

Dimensions

3

3 Seater

16

/

/

1880

/

2285

/

3110

/

9800

/

5380

Fuel Economy

/

9.5

70

70

Comfort

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

8AT

Manual

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

235/65 R16C

/

235/65 R16C

/

Key Spec

2.2 L - 3.7 L

2.5 L - 3.5 L

125 BHP - 299

88 BHP - 277

& 10AT & 8AT & Automatic & Manual

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

2 - 13

3 - 13 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

2.7 L

Diesel

Gasoline

165

158 BHP

331

243

Technologies

/

/

/

Normal, Eco, Slippery, Tow/Haul

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Transit Cargo Van 350M MR

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB

    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Related comparisons

Editor's PickToyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Transit Cargo Van 350M MR if you care more about power; choose Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Ford | Transit Cargo Van 350M MR

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter A/T

Ford | Transit Cargo Van 350M MR

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter M/T

Ford | Transit Cargo Van 350M MR

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

Ford | Transit Cargo Van 350M MR

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van

Ford | Transit Cargo Van 350M MR

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Transit Cargo Van 350M MR has a fuel consumption of No data, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Transit Cargo Van 350M MR has a wheelbase of No data, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Transit Cargo Van 350M MR uses Front Drive, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB uses Rear Wheel Drive.