XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) vs XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
/
4953 mm
/
2140 mm
/
1775 mm
/
2985 mm
/
314 L
/
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
/
71 L
/
13.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
/
300 BHP
/
420 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) if you care more about overall equipment; choose XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) has a wheelbase of 2985 mm, while XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) has a wheelbase of 2985 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) uses All Wheel Drive, while XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) uses All Wheel Drive.