ZS 1.5L STD vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
170
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
1318
17
17
5
5
4323
4323
1809
1809
1653
1653
2585
2585
359/1166
359/1166
145
145
Fuel Economy
17.2
17.2
45
45
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Smart Key
Manual
Manual
Interior
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
Front Row Seats
Fabric
Fabric
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
10.1
10.1
✓
✓
✓
✓
4
4
Transmission
CVT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
H Torsional Beam
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
Disc
Disc
Disc
Disc
215/55 R17
215/55 R17
215/55 R17
215/55 R17
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
112 BHP - 168
112 BHP - 168
6AT & Automatic & CVT
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
118 BHP
88
88
180
180
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ZS 1.5L STD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
ZS 1.5L STD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ZS 1.5L STD if you care more about overall equipment; choose ZS 1.5L STD if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ZS 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while ZS 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ZS 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585, while ZS 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZS 1.5L STD uses Front Drive, while ZS 1.5L STD uses Front Drive.