300 Challenger 2.0T vs Defender 90 SE (P300) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

191 km/h

4

4

1998 cc

/

Chinese

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4760 mm

4583 mm

1930 mm

2008 mm

1927 mm

1969 mm

2750 mm

2587 mm

400 L

397 L

224 m

/

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

10 Km/L

75 L

88 L

10 Km/L

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

9

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L

2.0 L - 5 L

223 BHP - 342 BHP

300 BHP - 635

Automatic

8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 8 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

V

2.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Single Turbo

Single Turbo

4

/

224 BHP

300 BHP

387 Nm

400 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 300 Challenger 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Defender 90 SE (P300)

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • Superior off-road capability
    • Luxurious and durable interior design
    • Multiple options for powerful engines

    Negative

    • High price compared to competitors
    • Relatively high fuel consumption
    • A bit complicated infotainment system

    Related comparisons

    Editor's Pick300 Challenger 2.0T

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price; choose Defender 90 SE (P300) if you care more about power.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Tank | 300 Challenger 2.0T

    VS

    Hyundai | Hyundai Palisade 2022 3.8L GDi (AWD) Smart

    Tank | 300 Challenger 2.0T

    VS

    Exeed | VX Luxury

    Tank | 300 Challenger 2.0T

    VS

    Toyota | RAV4 2.5L Adventure

    Tank | 300 Challenger 2.0T

    VS

    Peugeot | Peugeot 408 2024 1.6T GT

    Tank | 300 Challenger 2.0T

    VS

    Audi | Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Defender 90 SE (P300) uses All Wheel Drive.