300 Challenger 2.0T vs Defender 90 SE (P300) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

191 km/h

4

4

1998 cc

/

Chinese

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4760 mm

4583 mm

1930 mm

2008 mm

1927 mm

1969 mm

2750 mm

2587 mm

400 L

397 L

224 m

/

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

10 Km/L

75 L

88 L

10 Km/L

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

9

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L

2.0 L - 3.0 L

224 BHP

300 BHP - 400 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater - 8 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

V

2.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Single Turbo

Single Turbo

4

/

224 BHP

300 BHP

387 Nm

400 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 300 Challenger 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Defender 90 SE (P300)

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's Pick300 Challenger 2.0T

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price; choose Defender 90 SE (P300) if you care more about power.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Tank | 300 Challenger 2.0T

    VS

    Geely | Monjaro 2026 GF 4WD

    Tank | 300 Challenger 2.0T

    VS

    Toyota | RAV4 ADV 4X4

    Tank | 300 Challenger 2.0T

    VS

    Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2024 1.5T Infinity S-AWD

    Tank | 300 Challenger 2.0T

    VS

    Jetour | T1 i-DM Standard

    Tank | 300 Challenger 2.0T

    VS

    Volkswagen | T Roc R-Line

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Defender 90 SE (P300) uses All Wheel Drive.