300 Challenger 2.0T vs Defender 90 SE (P300) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
191 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
/
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4760 mm
4583 mm
1930 mm
2008 mm
1927 mm
1969 mm
2750 mm
2587 mm
400 L
397 L
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
10 Km/L
75 L
88 L
10 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.0 L - 5 L
223 BHP - 342 BHP
300 BHP - 635
Automatic
8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
/
224 BHP
300 BHP
387 Nm
400 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Defender 90 SE (P300)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price; choose Defender 90 SE (P300) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Defender 90 SE (P300) uses All Wheel Drive.