Cherokee 3.2L Longitude vs C4 Feel Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185 km/h
200 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4624 mm
4360 mm
1860 mm
2032 mm
1681 mm
1525 mm
2718 mm
2670 mm
841 L
380 L
Fuel Economy
9.9 Km/L
17.9 Km/L
60 L
50 L
9.9 Km/L
17.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L - 3.2 L
1.2 L - 1.6 L
184 BHP - 272 BHP
155 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
Engine
3.2 L
1.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
271 BHP
155 BHP
324 Nm
240 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cherokee 3.2L Longitude
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
C4 Feel
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickC4 Feel
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about interior space; choose C4 Feel if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while C4 Feel has a fuel consumption of 5.59. Therefore, C4 Feel is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm, while C4 Feel has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive, while C4 Feel uses Front Wheel Drive.