Cherokee 3.2L Longitude vs Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185 km/h
170 km/h
/
4
/
1790 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4624 mm
4460 mm
1860 mm
1825 mm
1681 mm
1620 mm
2718 mm
2640 mm
841 L
407 L
Fuel Economy
9.9 Km/L
22.2 Km/L
60 L
36 L
9.9 Km/L
22.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L - 3.2 L
1.8 L - 1798 L
184 BHP - 272 BHP
121 - 138 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & Continuous Variable Transmission (CVT) & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid & Petrol & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.2 L
1.8 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
271 BHP
122 BHP
324 Nm
163 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cherokee 3.2L Longitude
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- High reliability and good retention value
Negative
- Engine performance is poor in stimulation and traction
- Limited background storage space
- Unsatisfactory control of the entertainment system and the user interface
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about interior space; choose Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV) has a fuel consumption of 4.5. Therefore, Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm, while Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV) has a wheelbase of 2640 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive, while Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV) uses Front Wheel Drive.