Cherokee 3.2L Longitude vs Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD) Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
185 km/h
200
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4624 mm
4856
1860 mm
1926
1681 mm
1900
2718 mm
2800
841 L
750
Fuel Economy
9.9 Km/L
9.1
60 L
90
9.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Key Spec
2.4 L - 3.2 L
2.0 L
184 BHP - 272 BHP
214 - 251 BHP
Automatic
AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.2 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
271 BHP
248 BHP
324 Nm
355
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cherokee 3.2L Longitude
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHaval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about fuel economy; choose Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD) has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm, while Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD) has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive, while Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD) uses All Wheel Drive.