Cherokee 3.2L Longitude vs Mokka 1.2T Ultimate Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185 km/h
200 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4624 mm
4151 mm
1860 mm
1791 mm
1681 mm
1531 mm
2718 mm
2557 mm
841 L
options.1,372 L
Fuel Economy
9.9 Km/L
16.9 Km/L
60 L
44 L
9.9 Km/L
16.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L - 3.2 L
1.2 L
184 BHP - 272 BHP
130 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.2 L
1.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
271 BHP
130 BHP
324 Nm
230 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cherokee 3.2L Longitude
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Mokka 1.2T Ultimate
- 360 Degree camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMokka 1.2T Ultimate
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about interior space; choose Mokka 1.2T Ultimate if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while Mokka 1.2T Ultimate has a fuel consumption of 5.92. Therefore, Mokka 1.2T Ultimate is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm, while Mokka 1.2T Ultimate has a wheelbase of 2557 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive, while Mokka 1.2T Ultimate uses Front Wheel Drive.