CarteaCompare CarsCherokee 3.2L Longitude vs HS3 1.5T Luxury

Cherokee 3.2L Longitude vs HS3 1.5T Luxury Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

185 km/h

200 km/h

/

4

/

1490 cc

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4624 mm

4655 mm

1860 mm

1900 mm

1681 mm

1668 mm

2718 mm

2770 mm

841 L

/

Fuel Economy

9.9 Km/L

/

60 L

/

9.9 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Sports

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.6

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.4 L - 3.2 L

1.5 L - 2.0 L

184 BHP - 272 BHP

166 BHP - 248 BHP

Automatic

7DCT & 8-Speed Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.2 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

271 BHP

166 BHP

324 Nm

258 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS
  • HS3 1.5T Luxury

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHS3 1.5T Luxury

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about power; choose HS3 1.5T Luxury if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV)

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Opel | Mokka 1.2T Ultimate

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Geely | Geely Geometry C 2024 400 GS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while HS3 1.5T Luxury has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm, while HS3 1.5T Luxury has a wheelbase of 2770 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS3 1.5T Luxury, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive, while HS3 1.5T Luxury uses Front Wheel Drive.