Cherokee 3.2L Longitude vs HS5 Basic 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185 km/h
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
4 Doors
4624 mm
4760 mm
1860 mm
1907 mm
1681 mm
1700 mm
2718 mm
2870 mm
841 L
453 L
/
130 m
Fuel Economy
9.9 Km/L
7.1 Km/L
60 L
64 L
9.9 Km/L
7.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L - 3.2 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
184 BHP - 272 BHP
221 BHP - 252 BHP
Automatic
8-speed integrated manual/automatic transmission & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.2 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
271 BHP
221 BHP
324 Nm
340 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cherokee 3.2L Longitude
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
HS5 Basic 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about price; choose HS5 Basic 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while HS5 Basic 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm, while HS5 Basic 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2870 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS5 Basic 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive, while HS5 Basic 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.