Cherokee 3.2L Longitude vs Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

185 km/h

200 km/h

/

6

/

3956 cc

/

Japanese

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

3 Doors

4624 mm

4235 mm

1860 mm

1840 mm

1681 mm

1910 mm

2718 mm

2310 mm

841 L

700 L

/

290 m

Fuel Economy

9.9 Km/L

8 Km/L

60 L

90 L

9.9 Km/L

8 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

4

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.4 L - 3.2 L

4.0 L - 4.0 L

184 BHP - 272 BHP

228 BHP - 228 BHP

Automatic

6 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 6-Speed Automatic & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Petrol & Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater - 5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

LED with Halogen

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.2 L

4.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

271 BHP

228 BHP

324 Nm

360 Nm

/

V

/

4

Technologies

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS
  • Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCherokee 3.2L Longitude

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about price; choose Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV)

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Opel | Mokka 1.2T Ultimate

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Geely | Geely Geometry C 2024 400 GS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm, while Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) has a wheelbase of 2310 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) uses Four Wheel Drive.