Cherokee 3.2L Longitude vs Suzuki SX4 2014 Outdoor Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
185 km/h
180
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4624 mm
4150
1860 mm
1755
1681 mm
1605
2718 mm
2500
841 L
253
Fuel Economy
9.9 Km/L
13.9
60 L
42
9.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
CVT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L - 3.2 L
2.0 L
184 BHP - 272 BHP
150 BHP
Automatic
CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.2 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
271 BHP
150 BHP
324 Nm
190
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cherokee 3.2L Longitude
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Suzuki SX4 2014 Outdoor
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSuzuki SX4 2014 Outdoor
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about interior space; choose Suzuki SX4 2014 Outdoor if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while Suzuki SX4 2014 Outdoor has a fuel consumption of 7.19. Therefore, Suzuki SX4 2014 Outdoor is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm, while Suzuki SX4 2014 Outdoor has a wheelbase of 2500. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive, while Suzuki SX4 2014 Outdoor uses All Wheel Drive.