Cherokee 3.2L Longitude vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

185 km/h

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

5

4624 mm

4500

1860 mm

1842

1681 mm

1746

2718 mm

2670

841 L

/

/

Flush Door

/

18

Fuel Economy

9.9 Km/L

16.6

60 L

/

9.9 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Manual

Interior

/

Driver Seat

/

12.3

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

Infotainment

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

/

6

Transmission

/

7DCT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Key Spec

2.4 L - 3.2 L

1.5 L - 1.6 L

184 BHP - 272 BHP

154 - 197 BHP

Automatic

6DCT AT & 7-speed Dual-Clutch Transmission (DCT) & 7DCT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.2 L

1.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

271 BHP

197 BHP

324 Nm

290

/

1.6L TDGI

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS
  • Tiggo7 Pro Max COM

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Steering Adjustment

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTiggo7 Pro Max COM

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV)

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Opel | Mokka 1.2T Ultimate

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Geely | Geely Geometry C 2024 400 GS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, Tiggo7 Pro Max COM is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.