Cherokee 3.2L Longitude vs Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185 km/h
180 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4624 mm
4175 mm
1860 mm
1775 mm
1681 mm
1610 mm
2718 mm
2500 mm
841 L
375 L
Fuel Economy
9.9 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
60 L
47 L
9.9 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L - 3.2 L
1.6 L - 1586 L
184 BHP - 272 BHP
115 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.2 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
271 BHP
115 BHP
324 Nm
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cherokee 3.2L Longitude
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickVitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about interior space; choose Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm, while Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD has a wheelbase of 2500 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive, while Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.