CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs BYD Song Plus 2024 1.5L PHEV (FWD) Comparison

Car Information

/

8.3

Engine / Motor

/

170

/

4

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

215 / 60 / R16

/

4275

4775

1765

1875

1535

1680

2570

2765

/

574

Fuel Economy

15.3

22.2

48 LITRES

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Dynamic Stability Control

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

6

/

/

/

Transmission

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.5 L - 1.5 L

145 BHP - 148 BHP

197 BHP - 360 BHP

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

AT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder

/

148 HP

197 BHP

148 HP @ 6000 RPM

/

192

325

192 NM @ 2800 RPM

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Speed Alert
  • BYD Song Plus 2024 1.5L PHEV (FWD)

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about price; choose BYD Song Plus 2024 1.5L PHEV (FWD) if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Haval | Jolion 1.5T Basic

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Jeep | Renegade 2.4L Sport (4x2)

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Toyota | Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Haval | Haval H6 2021 Supreme

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while BYD Song Plus 2024 1.5L PHEV (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 4.5. Therefore, BYD Song Plus 2024 1.5L PHEV (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while BYD Song Plus 2024 1.5L PHEV (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2765. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BYD Song Plus 2024 1.5L PHEV (FWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while BYD Song Plus 2024 1.5L PHEV (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.