CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs Jolion 1.5T Basic Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
215 / 60 / R16
/
4275
4468 mm
1765
1841 mm
1535
1619 mm
2570
/
Fuel Economy
15.3
13.7 Km/L
48 LITRES
55 L
/
13.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Dynamic Stability Control
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.5 L
145 BHP - 148 BHP
140 BHP - 181 BHP
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Automatic & DCT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
148 HP
147 BHP
148 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
192
220 Nm
192 NM @ 2800 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Speed Alert
Jolion 1.5T Basic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX-3 2.0L GT 2WD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about price; choose Jolion 1.5T Basic if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while Jolion 1.5T Basic has a fuel consumption of 7.3. Therefore, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while Jolion 1.5T Basic has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while Jolion 1.5T Basic uses Front Wheel Drive.