CarteaCompare CarsCX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate

CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

187

/

3

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

215 / 60 / R16

/

4275

4211

1765

1765

1535

1605

2570

2604

/

410

Fuel Economy

15.3

20.8

48 LITRES

45

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Dynamic Stability Control

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.2 L

145 BHP - 148 BHP

110 BHP

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0L

1.2 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder

/

148 HP

110 BHP

148 HP @ 6000 RPM

/

192

205

192 NM @ 2800 RPM

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Speed Alert
  • Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about price; choose Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Haval | Jolion 1.5T Basic

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Jeep | Renegade 2.4L Sport (4x2)

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Toyota | Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Haval | Haval H6 2021 Supreme

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate has a fuel consumption of 4.81. Therefore, Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate has a wheelbase of 2604. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate uses Front Wheel Drive.