CarteaCompare CarsCX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL

CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

4

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

215 / 60 / R16

/

4275

4365

1765

1795

1535

1645

2570

2600

Fuel Economy

15.3

20.0

48 LITRES

45

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Dynamic Stability Control

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE

/

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.5 L - 1.5 L

145 BHP - 148 BHP

101 - 101

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

6 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder

/

148 HP

101 BHP

148 HP @ 6000 RPM

/

192

135

192 NM @ 2800 RPM

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Speed Alert
  • Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Temperature Display
    • Welcome Light
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Security System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
  • Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
  • Reliable service network and rich security features

Negative

  • The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
  • Limited back row space for large families
  • The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about price; choose Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Haval | Jolion 1.5T Basic

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Jeep | Renegade 2.4L Sport (4x2)

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Toyota | Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Haval | Haval H6 2021 Supreme

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL has a wheelbase of 2600. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL uses Front Wheel Drive.