CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs C5 2025 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
/
4
/
1496 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5
215 / 60 / R16
/
4275
4400
1765
1830
1535
1588
2570
2630
/
1381
/
5
/
360/1075
Fuel Economy
15.3
11.2
48 LITRES
51
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Dynamic Stability Control
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
6
6
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode
CVT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
/
Macpherson
/
Torsion Beam
Wheels/brakes
ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE
/
/
✓
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
145 BHP - 148 BHP
156 - 197
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
7 Speed DCT & 7DCT & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
148 HP
156 BHP
148 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
192
230
192 NM @ 2800 RPM
/
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
ECO, Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Speed Alert
C5 2025 Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose C5 2025 Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while C5 2025 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.93. Therefore, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while C5 2025 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2630. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, C5 2025 Comfort , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while C5 2025 Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.