CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs Changan CS75 2017 Distinguish (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
/
180
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
215 / 60 / R16
/
4275
4650
1765
1850
1535
1705
2570
2700
/
590
Fuel Economy
15.3
11.4
48 LITRES
58
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Dynamic Stability Control
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.8 L
145 BHP - 148 BHP
175 BHP
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
148 HP
175 BHP
148 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
192
230
192 NM @ 2800 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Speed Alert
Changan CS75 2017 Distinguish (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Changan CS75 2017 Distinguish (AWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while Changan CS75 2017 Distinguish (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.77. Therefore, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while Changan CS75 2017 Distinguish (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2700. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Changan CS75 2017 Distinguish (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while Changan CS75 2017 Distinguish (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.