CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

192 km/h

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

215 / 60 / R16

/

4275

4395 mm

1765

1795 mm

1535

1562 mm

2570

2655 mm

/

430 L

Fuel Economy

15.3

16.7 Km/L

48 LITRES

48 L

/

16.7 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Dynamic Stability Control

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

6

/

Transmission

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

145 BHP - 148 BHP

153 HP - 155 BHP

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder

/

148 HP

155 BHP

148 HP @ 6000 RPM

/

192

200 Nm

192 NM @ 2800 RPM

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Speed Alert
  • CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about price; choose CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Haval | Jolion 1.5T Basic

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Jeep | Renegade 2.4L Sport (4x2)

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Toyota | Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Haval | Haval H6 2021 Supreme

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD has a wheelbase of 2655 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.