CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
6
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
215 / 60 / R16
/
4275
5035
1765
1989
1535
1778
2570
3008
Fuel Economy
15.3
9.2
48 LITRES
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Dynamic Stability Control
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE
/
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 3.0 L
145 BHP - 148 BHP
252 - 337
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
8-speed Automatic (8AT) & 8AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
148 HP
337 BHP
148 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
192
445
192 NM @ 2800 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Speed Alert
Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about price; choose Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) has a wheelbase of 3008. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.