CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs HS3 1.5T Luxury Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
215 / 60 / R16
/
4275
4655 mm
1765
1900 mm
1535
1668 mm
2570
2770 mm
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
15.3
/
48 LITRES
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sports
Safety
Dynamic Stability Control
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
8
/
12.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.5 L - 2.0 L
145 BHP - 148 BHP
166 BHP - 248 BHP
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
7DCT & 8-Speed Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
148 HP
166 BHP
148 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
192
258 Nm
192 NM @ 2800 RPM
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Speed Alert
HS3 1.5T Luxury
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about price; choose HS3 1.5T Luxury if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while HS3 1.5T Luxury has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while HS3 1.5T Luxury has a wheelbase of 2770 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS3 1.5T Luxury, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while HS3 1.5T Luxury uses Front Wheel Drive.