CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs JS4 1.5T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
/
4
/
1498 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
215 / 60 / R16
/
4275
4410 mm
1765
1800 mm
1535
1660 mm
2570
2620 mm
/
5 Doors
/
520 L
/
202 m
Fuel Economy
15.3
12 Km/L
48 LITRES
50 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Dynamic Stability Control
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.5 L
145 BHP - 148 BHP
147 BHP
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
148 HP
147 BHP
148 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
192
210 Nm
192 NM @ 2800 RPM
/
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Speed Alert
JS4 1.5T
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickJS4 1.5T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose JS4 1.5T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while JS4 1.5T has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while JS4 1.5T has a wheelbase of 2620 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, JS4 1.5T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while JS4 1.5T uses Front Wheel Drive.