CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison

Car Information

/

8 s

/

189

/

390

/

4810*1925*1742

Dimensions

5

7

215 / 60 / R16

19

4275

4810

1765

1925

1535

1742

2570

2800

Fuel Economy

15.3

13

48 LITRES

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

10.25

/

/

10.25"

/

Driver Seat

/

/

Triple

/

/

/

Safety

Dynamic Stability Control

/

/

/

/

/

6

/

Infotainment

6

8

/

15.6

/

Battery/Charging

/

4

Transmission

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode

AT

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

-

145 BHP - 148 BHP

254 - 254

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

AT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0L

2.0L

Gasoline

Gasoline

SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder

2.0T GDI

148 HP

254

148 HP @ 6000 RPM

/

192

390

192 NM @ 2800 RPM

/

/

Turbocharge

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

19 ADAS Functions

/

/

/

Eco + Normal + Sport

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Speed Alert
  • Tiggo 9 Comfort

    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about price; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Haval | Jolion 1.5T Basic

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Jeep | Renegade 2.4L Sport (4x2)

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Toyota | Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Haval | Haval H6 2021 Supreme

Mazda | CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tiggo 9 Comfort, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.