CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs T1 Comfort 2026 Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
215 / 60 / R16
/
4275
4705
1765
1967
1535
1843
2570
2800
/
1690
/
1700
/
574
/
199
Fuel Economy
15.3
/
48 LITRES
70
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
Dynamic Stability Control
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode
8AT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
/
MacPherson
/
Multi-link
Wheels/brakes
ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE
/
/
✓
/
Disc
/
235/60 R19
/
235/60 R19
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.0
145 BHP - 148 BHP
254
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
8AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
148 HP
254
148 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
192
/
192 NM @ 2800 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Speed Alert
T1 Comfort 2026
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Strong performance in its price category
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- Fuel economy can be improved
- Limited options for the entertainment system
- A less widespread agent network
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX-3 2.0L GT 2WD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about price; choose T1 Comfort 2026 if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while T1 Comfort 2026 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while T1 Comfort 2026 has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, T1 Comfort 2026, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while T1 Comfort 2026 uses Front Drive.