CX5 Entry vs Atto 3 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
160 km/h
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
215/60R17
4550
4455
1840
1875
1675
1615
2700
2720
965
310
/
5 Doors
/
205 mm
Fuel Economy
/
/
56
/
/
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
5
/
Front Row Seats
/
LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
6
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
/
12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Battery/Charging
/
AC (7KW) DC (80KW)
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
/
Macpherson
/
Multi-Link
Wheels/brakes
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Key Spec
1.9 L - 2.5 L
/
151 BHP - 188 BHP
201 BHP
6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic
AT & DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
5 - 5
/
TBD
/
420 km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
190 BHP
201 BHP
251 Nm
310 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
9
/
BYD Blade Battery (LFP)
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX5 Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
Atto 3 Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX5 Entry if you care more about price; choose Atto 3 Comfort if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX5 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data, while Atto 3 Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX5 Entry has a wheelbase of 2700, while Atto 3 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Atto 3 Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX5 Entry uses Front Drive, while Atto 3 Comfort uses Front Drive.