CX5 Entry vs Atto 3 Premium Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
160 km/h
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
215/55R18
4550
4455 mm
1840
2050 mm
1675
1615 mm
2700
2720 mm
965
440 L
/
5 Doors
/
205 mm
Fuel Economy
/
/
56
/
/
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
5
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
6
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Automatic Anti-Glare
/
RCW
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
/
12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Battery/Charging
/
AC (7KW) DC (80KW)
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.9 L - 2.5 L
/
151 BHP - 188 BHP
201 BHP
6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic
AT & DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
5 - 5
/
TBD
/
420 km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
190 BHP
201 BHP
251 Nm
310 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
9
/
BYD Blade Battery (LFP)
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX5 Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
Atto 3 Premium
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Collision Detection
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX5 Entry if you care more about price; choose Atto 3 Premium if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX5 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data, while Atto 3 Premium has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX5 Entry has a wheelbase of 2700, while Atto 3 Premium has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Atto 3 Premium, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX5 Entry uses Front Drive, while Atto 3 Premium uses Front Wheel Drive.